Search for: "STATE v. INTERVAL"
Results 61 - 80
of 678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
The trial court, alas, erred in stating the relevant statistical concepts. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
United States, 346 F.2d 52, 54 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 (1966). 615 F. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:56 pm
_See Clausnitzer v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Daubert v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 10:50 am
LSI Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:13 pm
The question of fact was whether these were distributed at "stated intervals. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
These logos had been filed at regular intervals with a duplicated specification of goods and services. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:33 am
In the interval between Hanna's arrest and trial, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 12:45 pm
Nothing in the text of the National Labor Relations Act changed in that interval; it contains no language granting the Board authority over Indian tribes. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Professor Rothman is also well known for his advocacy for the superiority of confidence intervals over p-values in conveying important information about what range of values are reasonably compatible with the observed data.3 His criticisms of p-values and his advocacy for estimation with intervals have pushed biomedical publishing to embrace confidence intervals as more informative than just p-values. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Baker v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 8:05 am
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals handed down an interesting ruling in US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:35 am
State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Nasgovitz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 11:44 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
However, the judge stated that the “uncertain state of the law” meant that his conclusion on this point could only be provisional ([132]) until the CJEU gives guidance in Sky v SkyKick on what circumstances may constitute bad faith. [read post]
