Search for: "Safir v Safir"
Results 61 - 80
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
. * Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation resulting from conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:51 am
Id. at 818 (citing Safir v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
" Here, said the Appellate Division, it can be reasonably inferred that Officer intended to obtain a benefit for his fellow officer and friend within the meaning of the statute when he accessed confidential information in the computer system and confirmed for the friend the scope of the allegations of the complainant in the disciplinary investigation against him.Under the circumstances, the Appellate Division held that “The penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense… [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:21 am
”The Appellate Division sustained the Commissioner’s decision, commenting that under the circumstances “The penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience,” citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Further, said the court, “The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness,” citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32.The Appellate Division also considered the fact that “one of the two main witnesses relied upon by the hearing officer in reaching his conclusion had recanted his testimony” some two years later.The Commissioner, however, had denied Officer’s request for a new hearing based on “this new evidence. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm
Elas foram preparadas por William Safire, autor de outros discursos do presidente Richard Nixon. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:05 pm
Elas foram preparadas por William Safire, autor de outros discursos do presidente Richard Nixon. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:06 am
Citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the Appellate Division, noting that the volunteer’s acts of misconduct might not, individually, warrant expulsion from the Fire Department, said that “considering his conduct as a whole, we do not find the penalty of expulsion to be so disproportionate to the disciplinary charges as to be shocking to our sense of fairness. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:02 am
As to the Commissioner’s decision to terminate the police officer, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the Appellate Division said that “The penalty imposed does not shock the conscience since [the Commissioner] is accountable to the public for the integrity of the Department. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his position, the court, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d, 32, said that termination did not shock its sense of fairness as the Commissioner "is accountable to the public for the integrity of the Department. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 11:56 am
Safire (A132145).William Safire has absolutely nothing to do with this case, Williams v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Considering the “serious nature” of the Supervisor’s misconduct, the court said that the penalty imposed, dismissal, did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32 and Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
*** See Mari v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
Citing Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:48 am
Substantial evidence supports disciplinary hearing officer’s findings Mercado v Kelly, 54 AD3d 654 A police officer appealed his termination from his position as a New York City police officer after he was found guilty of certain charges following a disciplinary hearing. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:40 am
The court said that it is well established that courts must uphold the disciplinary penalty imposed by an appointing authority unless, as a law, it is an abuse of discretion, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:32 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal, the Appellate Division said that it did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
” As to the penalty imposed, dismissal, the Appellate Division said that “on the record before us, we do not find the penalty of termination shocking to the judicial conscience,” citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, and Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:35 pm
In Richardson v. [read post]
