Search for: "Samsung Electronics America, Inc"
Results 61 - 80
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California denying Apple’s request for a permanent injunction against Sam- sung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Wallis, MD Florida 2013http://t.co/7psHtlPOaz -> TRO granted to prevent open sourcing of infringing software BATTELLE ENERGY v SOUTHFORK SECURITY Idaho 2013http://t.co/b68D3Uw6mY -> Hosting agreement terminated for customer spamming AHOSTING, INC. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
SamsungIn these consolidated appeals, Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications Ameri- ca, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) challenge orders of the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 971 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1992). [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Burke, 2013 ONCA 424 http://t.co/ObmsSoNMLs -> German court inclined to hold Samsung liable for unfair exploitation of iPhone design elements http://t.co/cQvctJ95ay -> Snowden distributed encrypted copies of NSA docs around the world http://t.co/W0Vgft1xxG -> Gone in just ten seconds? [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 3:03 pm
The same day it dismissed that suit, plaintiff filed a second complaint against Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
Accordingly, Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung electronics America, Inc, and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC shall not file a motion seeking this administrative relief. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC". [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 10:21 am
Pender entered an "Initial Determination Granting Respondent HTC America, Inc.' [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
Case New Holland, Inc.), did not support Samsung's assertions. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:05 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsBoth Sides Instructed to Use Predictive Coding or Show Cause Why Not – http://bit.ly/Q1H6qx (Doug… [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:21 pm
The Respondents in this investigation are: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:02 pm
Tuesday, September 11, 2012 by Teresa Cook On August 24, 2012, a jury trial in the Northern District of California found that Samsung Electronics Co. infringed on six of seven patents held by Apple Inc and awarded $1.05 billion in damages to Apple. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:41 pm
In the Order, ALJ Pender granted a joint motion filed by Complainant OSRAM AG and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm
With the exception of certain kinds of standard-essential patents (for example, cellular standards patents), it's clear that the product will still be sold after being modified to work around the enforced patents, maybe after a minor disruption caused by the need to make those modifications.If products are named in an injunction order, they are only examples of infringement and do not limit the scope of an injunction that is worded like Judge Koh's two recent injunctions against… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:07 pm
LG Electronics Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: • Acer Inc. of Taiwan • Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California • Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington • Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York • Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland • Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas • Garmin USA,… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:48 am
I will then tell you what each side must prove to win on each of its contentions.As I previously explained, Apple seeks money damages from Samsung Electronics Company ("SEC"), Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
