Search for: "School District No. 23 v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11"
Results 61 - 80
of 650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
Rothschild,[10] the court concluded that NFTs, despite being virtual and intangible, qualified as “goods” within the scope of the Lanham Act.[11] Commerce Use of BAYC Marks by Yuga: Yuga’s utilization of the BAYC Marks in commerce was verified by the Court. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
IPSO 17284-23 MacMillan v spectator.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach, after investigation 16423-23 Green v The Sunday Times, 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 15588-23 Palin v liverpoolecho.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 9 Reporting of crime (2021, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 17771-23… [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Sidar, an appeal of a case where the District Court reconsidered its earlier position in favor of pseudonymity. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 11 July 2023 there was a hearing in the Haverfordwest District Registry case of Gammon v Riley. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Jim Jordan, a Systematic Disinformation Campaign, and January 6 (Aug. 23, 2021) 11. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
”[21] What is striking about this case is that the defendant’s indictment was not based on the typical insider trading statutes involving securities law violations but instead the general wire fraud statute.[22] While this case contains facts and methods usually seen in stock-related insider trading cases, it differs from traditional insider trading prosecutions in crucial ways.[23] This strategy by the DOJ provides prosecutors with a key advantage in digital asset cases. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:01 pm
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One petition for certiorari was filed on 5/11/23: Klamath Irrigation District v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
” IPSO Resolution Statement – 14832-23 Hyman v Sunday Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in open court and apologies On 16 May 2023, a statement in open court was read in resolution of the defamation case Campbell v MGN Limited QB-2020-003829. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am
Frontier Produce received multiple shipments of recalled onions sourced by ProSource on July 29, 2021, and August 11, 2021. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:14 pm
In the lawsuit EEOC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
Flores v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:40 pm
In other developments, the Second District Court of Appeal made a minor modification to its published opinion in Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:23 am
Nov. 11, 2022), ECF No. 173. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
