Search for: "Scott v. Majors"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm
Below, Scott Street of Akin Gump recaps the opinion handed down yesterday in Bloate v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
On the first complaint, the facts of the case line up very closely with the Universal v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 12:10 pm
McGregor v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 4:41 am
Scott v Leventhal 2020 NY Slip Op 33276(U) September 30, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 656211/2017 Judge: Debra A. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 11:44 am
The majority decision in Dred Scott (authored by Taney) held that neither Scott nor any other person of African descent—whether or not emancipated from slavery—could be "citizen of a state", and therefore was unable to bring suit in federal court on the ground of diversity. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Patent 4,848,289 was flawed in two major respects. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:00 pm
Scott Gold, Joe Mozingo and Maura Dolan report for the LA Times:State Sen. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:00 pm
Stanford student Scott Noveck wrote the following recap of Thursday’s decision in Meacham v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
A major constitutional controversy, with potentially far-reaching impact on the voting rights of minorities, reaches the Supreme Court in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
Scott Bomboy is editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:45 am
Supreme Court decisions is Dred Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:41 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Scott v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm
Alan Scott Rau is the Burg Family Professor of Law at The University of Texas at Austin School of Law. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:41 am
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 7:33 am
EDT, the American Bar Association will host a webinar reviewing major criminal law cases of the current term (including Van Buren v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:51 am
Recent Stanford Law graduate Scott Stewart authored this recap of Monday’s decision in Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:37 pm
On March 1, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Gobeille v. [read post]
