Search for: "Scott v. Unknown Party" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am by Cody Poplin
Reuters reports that the attackers killed twelve military personnel and took an unknown number hostage. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
Amendment VI, as interpreted in, among other cases, Scott v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The second part of this year yielded several cases addressing instances of workplace violence, including one case involving a third-party attack and another an assault by a co-worker. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:54 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  I noted that, even before seriously considering relocating, I had been heartbroken in 2018 when that year's otherwise heartening midterm elections included a hair's-breadth win by an unknown congressman in the governor's race, along with an even closer loss by a long-time Democratic incumbent U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am by Sasha Volokh
Aggrieved parties might thus not be able to challenge Board rules until after implementation. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm by Mark Walsh
The Supreme Court was unusually transparent in its explanation for the late recusal, with Clerk of the Court Scott Harris telling the parties, in a letter released by the court, that “the ordinary conflict check conducted in Justice Kennedy’s chambers inadvertently failed to find this conflict. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:05 am by Bexis
  We’re talking about the recent Minnesota Supreme Court decision, Curtis v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
Google Fallout First filed in August 2010, the Oracle v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
In the case of Burston v Hanson [2022] FCA 1235 Bromwich J ordered the leader of the One Nation party, Paul Hanson, to pay $250,000 damages to former Senator Brian Burston after she falsely claim that he had sexually abused a female staffer  in his parliamentary office. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm by David Post
Goldwater, Baker, Scott men of real character and patriotism and dignity, who understood the need to put the needs of the country before the needs of their party—visited the Oval Office and gave Nixon the bad news: they wouldn't support him anymore, and he would lose an impeachment vote in the Senate. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am by SHG
At first blush, this would appear to be based upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis v. [read post]