Search for: "Searles v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cornish Glennroy Blair-Ford v CRS Adventures Ltd [2012] EWHC 2360 (QB) (13 August 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Nicklinson, R (on the application of) v Ministry Of Justice [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin) (16 August 2012) Albion Water Ltd, R (on the application of) v Water Services Regulation Authority [2012] EWHC 2259 (Admin) (16 August 2012) Searle & Anor v Secretary of State for Communities and… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Watson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Watson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Watson v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
United States: Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former head of the IMF, has filed a countersuit of defamation against the hotel maid who accused him of sexual assault. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:04 pm
Business v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:21 pm
On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in National Meat Association v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
The IPKat's excellent and scholarly friend Norman Siebrasse tells him that he has recently become aware of a recent Canadian decision, Nazerali v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Searle & Co., 705 F. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
Law on International Commercial Arbitration and served as the Chair of the Arbitration Task Force of the Searle Civil Justice Institute. – In a press release dated the same day as the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
Searle & Co. 358 F.3d 916, 919-20 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Searle & Co., 748 F. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm
Sometime later a state trooper arrived and stopped his vehicle behind ours with its lights flashing. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
