Search for: "Sears Holdings Corp." Results 61 - 80 of 220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2016, 9:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sears Holdings Corp., 2016 WL 5080028, No. 12-cv-9033 (N.D. [read post]
In October, the court put the six proposed class actions on hold while the FTC determined what “flushable” meant and whether the claims violated the FTC Act, and last month, the court recommended the suits be consolidated. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:41 pm by Ad Law Defense
** A Return to the Limits of In Re Tobacco II? [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 4:48 am by Naz Modirzadeh
Army/Marine Corps COIN Manual, an approach many have compared to CVE—frames the U.S. and global move to CVE as motivated by “learning” from “more than a decade since the searing experience of 9/11. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 7:58 pm by Greene LLP
Sears Holdings Corp et al. made no determination of liability on the part of Kmart. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
Whirlpool Corp, the trial court did, however, permit the plaintiff to conduct a supplemental deposition of the defense expert witness to question him about his calculations[15]. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
What if one holds that the contract was procured by barratry and is void, and the other one reaches the opposite conclusion? [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:43 pm by James Galvin
Inc. 06366QN86 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Deere & Company 06366QN94 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Moodys Corporation 06366QP27 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to CBS Corp. 06366QP35 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Schlumberger, Ltd. 06366QP43 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Amazon.com, Inc. 06366QP68 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Whirlpool… [read post]
6 May 2015, 12:00 pm by Greene LLP
Sears Holdings Corp. where the court said that it was not persuaded by CVS’s assertions that the multiple alleged kickbacks are de minimis and cannot form the basis of an actionable claim. [read post]