Search for: "Shell, I. v. Shell, B." Results 61 - 80 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 12:58 pm by scottgaille
“Unanticipated Site Condition” means a Site Condition that satisfies all of the following requirements: (a) the existence of (or risk of encountering) the Site Condition was not identified in (i) this agreement, (ii) any reports (including geotechnical reports) received by the contractor group prior to the effective date, or (iii) any other written document or communication received by the contractor group prior to the effective date; (b) a contractor exercising Good… [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Claimants will be allowed to prove that:(i) SPDC was involved in bribing the witnesses [U], [V], [II], [YY], [KK], [LL], [MM] and [NN] because [a.] [read post]
The Supreme Court disagreed, holding that “there is nothing special or conclusive about the bare parent/subsidiary relationship… the general principles which determine whether A owes a duty of care to C in respect of the harmful activities of B are not novel at all”. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
  I expect to see much more of this in the coming years. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Stephen Page
In March I presented for Legawise at its annual family law conference in Brisbane. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
It also defines what a “secure locking device” means (as seen below in ss. 6(b)(i) and 5(1)(b)(iii)) in s. 1 as a device: (a) that can only be opened or released by the use of an electronic, magnetic or mechanical key or by setting the device in accordance with an alphabetical or numerical combination; and (b) that, when applied to a firearm, prevents the firearm from being discharged. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
It also defines what a “secure locking device” means (as seen below in ss. 6(b)(i) and 5(1)(b)(iii)) in s. 1 as a device: (a) that can only be opened or released by the use of an electronic, magnetic or mechanical key or by setting the device in accordance with an alphabetical or numerical combination; and (b) that, when applied to a firearm, prevents the firearm from being discharged. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary continues on Collins v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Hayley Evans
To that end, practices like those espoused in Pentagon policy, requiring autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons systems to undergo “rigorous hardware and software verification and validation (V&V) and realistic system developmental and operational test and evaluation (T&E),” can help reduce the risk of unintended combat engagements. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Bethke & Morgan Shell, Public Defense Innovation in Texas, 51 Ind. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:13 pm by Robert Chesney
That question is pending before Judge Tanya Chutkan as an ancillary issue in the Doe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
The longer answer with explanation is below.BackgroundCluster munitions are “bombs, rockets, and artillery shells that disperse explosive sub-munitions over wide areas. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am by Philip Segal
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  History plays a role: SCt has gone back to historical sources for patent law, e.g., Impressions v. [read post]