Search for: "Sine v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
"Although peer review, or general acceptance in the relevant scientific community, is not always a sine qua non for admissibility of an expert's theory, see Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:35 am by Jennifer Daskal
With more than 30 amicus briefs filed in the Microsoft Ireland case – including from members of Congress, the European Commission, the Chamber of Commerce, privacy advocates and dozens of media organizations – United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Monday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87), the complaint herein sufficiently alleges a cause of action in negligence against the SLS defendants and the SLS employees (see Rivera v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 191 F Supp 2d at 421; see also Williams v State of New York, 84 AD3d 412). [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 1:32 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 The article also analyses the relatively recent judgement Kailash Nath v DDA and how the Supreme Court tried to construe Section 74 to mitigate the uncertainty brought about by the dichotomy. [read post]