Search for: "Slater v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
In 1876, lawyer and legal publisher Carl Jahn published the first issue of the Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin, a precursor of the Ohio State Bar Journal, and solicited Ohio lawyers to submit “law points of general interest. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:08 am
Currently, this may be HBO’s best option for reducing the rate of piracy of its programs in the United States; the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently ruled that the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) does not have the authority to prosecute foreign websites that contain pirated content in ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:44 am
Nothing in Title 17 of the United States Code even hints at that possibility. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:01 am
Slater, Ph.D., P.E., a professional engineering expert witness stating that his opinion is based on speculation and is not reliable. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
However, animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (naming it Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
The case is Naruto v Slater, where the plaintiff is PETA acting on behalf of Naruto as “his Next Friends“. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:59 am
However, there is absolutely no reason why this case should be about United States copyright: the picture was taken in Indonesia, the camera owner is a British citizen, and Wikimedia is registered as a charity in the UK. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:59 am
However, there is absolutely no reason why this case should be about United States copyright: the picture was taken in Indonesia, the camera owner is a British citizen, and Wikimedia is registered as a charity in the UK. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr by Steve Slater. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:06 pm
By Dwight Slater Thought the fight over the 2012 redistricting process was over? [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 6:47 pm
[1] Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
Here are the articles (full access is limited to subscribers):Laura Weinrib (University of Chicago), "The Sex Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
All this in a state – Illinois – where the highest court forbids FDCA-based common-law causes of action (see Martin v. [read post]
