Search for: "Smith v. AC"
Results 61 - 80
of 197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in… [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in… [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
That is, in my view, exactly right and contrasts with the wholly mistaken view taken by the court in R (Smith) v Land Registry (Peterborough) [2009] EWHC 328 (Admin). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith was heard on the 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Burnip v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
That doctrine was developed in Bulli Coal Mining Co v Osborne [1899] AC 351 which found that limitation would not be applied “in the case of concealed fraud, so long as the party defrauded remains in ignorance without any fault of his own” and also rejected the idea that “active concealment was essential”. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 2:23 pm
” Ace Elec. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
The Court of Appeal (Smith LJ giving the leading judgment) held against Mrs Ariemuguvbe on both points. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
The Court of Appeal (Smith LJ giving the leading judgment) held against Mrs Ariemuguvbe on both points. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Clark v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The action then shifted back to the House of Lords, who in Doherty v Birmingham CC [2009] 1 AC 367 (our note is here) reaffirmed the majority approach in Kay, although they crowbarred a bit more into gateway (b). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The action then shifted back to the House of Lords, who in Doherty v Birmingham CC [2009] 1 AC 367 (our note is here) reaffirmed the majority approach in Kay, although they crowbarred a bit more into gateway (b). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
R (Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 760 (Admin) – Read case Part 2 of Matthew Hill’s feature on the duty to investigate deaths under human rights law (read Part I). [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson & Co… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson & Co… [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:25 pm
Todd Smith, author of the recently-launched Texas Appellate Law Blog, offered up an interesting piece yesterday on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Hall Street Associates LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:17 pm
McLennan of HindmanSanchez in the firm's blog, HOA Legi-Slate Eaton v. [read post]
