Search for: "Smith v. Board of Commissioners"
Results 61 - 80
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 10:45 pm
At the labor board hearing in San Francisco, the commissioner was persuaded by my argument that under the California Supreme Court ruling in Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 10:45 pm
At the labor board hearing in San Francisco, the commissioner was persuaded by my argument that under the California Supreme Court ruling in Smith v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:51 am
He concurred in the majority’s decision to reverse so that the Board of County Commissioners can create a record. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm
From Judge Wallace Tashima's opinion (joined by Judges Milan Smith and Jacqueline Nguyen) in Miller v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 1:33 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/2/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada… [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 26/1/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada… [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:12 am
Smith U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Boards and Commissions may allow for a claimant’s flawed, but explainable, memory [see Matter of Updike v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
(quotingKerr v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
Smith What bureaucrat can we blame for this? [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
In Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625, the Court of Appeals decided that performance evaluations and letters of criticism placed in the employee’s personnel file were not “disciplinary penalties” and thus could be placed there without having to first hold a disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:09 pm
" 2d Flight 93 memorial board member resigns over 'eroded trust' - "Like Somerset County Commissioner Pamela Tokar-Ickes, who resigned earlier this week, Gregory Walker was one of the original 15 people appointed to the commission in 2003. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:57 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 501 U.S. 868 (1991). [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
New Evidence from a Natural Experiment Posted by Ana Albuquerque (Boston University) and Julie Lei Zhu (Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance), on Wednesday, April 4, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Audits, Firm performance, Internal auditors, International governance, Management, Risk-taking, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, Small firms, SOX Section 404 How Board Skills Vary by Director Age… [read post]
