Search for: "Smith v. Lowe et al" Results 61 - 80 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 am by Schachtman
” Philip Wexler, Bethesda, et al., eds., 2 Encyclopedia of Toxicology 96 (2005). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Dallas County, et al., v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Phil
Smith at his EDTexweblog discussing Judge Ron Clark's grant of the plaintiff's Motion for Prejudgment Interest in the Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
Such an employee resembles an independent contractor who can shift from firm to firm at low cost to either employee or employer.[4] Because the relationship between such employees and the corporation does not create appropriable quasi-rents, opportunism by the board is not a concern. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Talcott, et al., “Asbestos-associated Diseases in a Cohort of Cigarette-Filter Workers,” 321 N.Engl.J.Med. 1220 (1989). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Goossens H, Giesendorf AJ, Vandamme P, et al. (1995). [read post]