Search for: "Smith v. Martinez"
Results 61 - 80
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 10:29 am
Martinez, 781 S.E.2d 532 (N.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:08 pm
LEXIS 53088 (ED CA, April 19, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Buddhist inmate's complaint about denial of chapel access for group services.In Martinez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:33 am
In fact, the Court said this “just three Terms ago” in Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Martinez: From Live and Let Live to My Way or the Highway? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:11 am
Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977). [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:11 am
Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:49 pm
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976); United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976); United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:06 am
A 2010 California Supreme Court decision, Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:48 am
Ct. 1388 (2011), and further consideration in light of Martinez; and three other claims for consideration of equitable tolling under Rhines v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 9:22 pm
Global Staffing (10th Cir., June 17, 2015) (affirming judgement as a matter of law and jury verdict against Smith on his Title VII, civil rights, and ADA claims)Levy v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 1:29 am
State of Utah (10th Cir., April 30, 2015) (affirming the district court's entry of summary judgment against Alvarado on ADA, Rehabilitation Act, and wrongful termination)Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Here on the Reed Smith side of the blog, three of our core contributors are located in Pennsylvania and California. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
With respect to Section 10.07(c), the Legislature's intent is demonstrated by the label - "civil" - given to the provision by the Legislature, the way in which the provision was codified, and the enforcement procedures it establishes, all identifiers of legislative intent as held in Smith v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
In Smith, the Supreme Court held that, in this second step of the inquiry, a court should be guided by the seven factors which it had first outlined in Kennedy v Mendoza- Martinez: (1) whether the sanction involves an affirmative disability or restraint; (2) whether it has historically been regarded as a punishment; (3) whether it comes into play only upon a finding of scienter; (4) whether its operation will promote traditional aims of punishment-retribution and… [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Smith, 263 F.3d 571 (U.S. [read post]
