Search for: "Smith v. Mr. D's, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1339 (11th Cir. 2002), abrogated on other grounds by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  BACKGROUND   Last week the SEC issued a settled administrative order finding that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (now rebranded as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management) failed to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sam McClure, Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc.: should be purely presumptive renewal without even the initial filing. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
And the French civil Supreme Court, the Cour de Cassation, held that a corporation cannot be the author of a work protected by copyright: “une personne morale ne peut avoir la qualité d’auteur. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
… and then Darren takes the floor for a more in-depth analysis.* Canary Wharf: great place name, not much hope for a trade mark ...Jeremy writes upCanary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision with a history, and a curious trade mark tale too.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the masterful… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Saleh v Nebel, 2015 ONSC 3680 [42] I told Mr. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
On Friday, Floyd LJ gave the leading judgment (with which Patten and Tomlinson LJJ agreed) in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290. [read post]