Search for: "Smith v. Price et al" Results 61 - 80 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2011, 4:22 am by Marie Louise
(Kluwer Patent Blog) Fortical (Calcitonin-salmon) – US: Obviousness in chemical formulations: (unclaimed) purpose of limitation leads to nonobviousness holding: Unigene Labs. and Upsher-Smith Labs v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
After five days of filing Hubbard II, the plaintiff’s counsel filed a related case, Nuckles, et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
If the market is competitive, a party making a take it-or-leave it offer must set price and other terms that will lead to sales despite the absence of particularized negotiations. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by Marie Louise
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Rincon Band of Indians (10-330) and Applera Corp., et al., v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Talcott, et al., “Asbestos-associated Diseases in a Cohort of Cigarette-Filter Workers,” 321 N.Engl.J.Med. 1220 (1989). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am by Lyle Denniston
  They are: Astra USA Inc., et al., v. [read post]