Search for: "Speculative Product Design Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2013, 10:52 am by Eric Alexander
DePuy Orthopedics, Inc., No. 11-80007-Civ-Williams, 2012 U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
  We hasten to add that the same argument preempts all design defect claims against FDA-approved products since all design changes require pre-approval. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., No. 15-1402 (scope of 271(e) safe harbor) Exhaustion: Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  This one addresses how to incorporate genetic variation into the design and implementation of clinical investigations. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc., 563 F.3d 38 (3d Cir. 2009). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Soule limited consumer expectations to “cases in which the everyday experience of the product’s users permits a conclusion that the product's design violated minimum safety assumptions. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
Sources: Management Science Associates Inc., state revenue departments, author calculations. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
 The court rejected product liability for the design characteristics of a design that could not be changed. [read post]
26 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
Patent 4,146,745As to the second factor, Bose's advertisements "tout the utilitarian advantages of the product design. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Soft Sheen Products, Inc., 486 A.2d 712, 725 (D.C. 1985); Wooderson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:22 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
The consolidated federal case is In re DePuy Orthopedics Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, 10-MD-2197, U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
Nov. 5, 2014) and another where “loss of control over business reputation” established irreparable harm in circumstances where the domain name owner actually operated a business in the same market as the plaintiff and sold products “slightly dissimilar” from plaintiff’s products (Kreation Juicery, Inc. v. [read post]