Search for: "Standard Steel, LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Law Judge Jane Vandeventer issued her decision June 1, 2007. *** Sprain Brook Manor Nursing Home, LLC (2-CA-37258, 37448; 351 NLRB No. 75) Scarsdale, NY Dec. 21, 2007. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:02 am
DreamWorks, LLC et al.516 F.3d 993 (Fed. [read post]
In finding the employee did not lose the protection of the Act when he raised concerns about the employees’ working conditions to the employer’s safety manager at a safety meeting, the Board adopted the judge’s application of the four-factor test set forth in Atlantic Steel. [read post]
On September 5, 2019, the Board issued its decision in General Motors LLC, 368 NLRB No. 68 (2019), and issued a Notice and Invitation to the parties and amici to file briefs addressing the standard currently in place. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 5:33 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Court of Chancery Decides Fiduciary Duty Claims Against LLC Manager and Allows Dissolution Claim to Proceed and Clarifies Standards for Member to Seek Dissolution of LLC. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
The employer was the Bethlehem Steel Company, at the Bethlehem Steel Sparrows Point Shipyard. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:24 am
An additional problem for Long Branch will be the recent decision of Judge Lawson in the prerogative writ suit, Park Steel v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 7:00 am
All electrical components are built according to NEMA standards. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:20 pm by Lee Tankle
The Board did say that given the public nature of the posts, which were made offsite and outside of working hours, the standard Atlantic Steel test used to determine whether comments were so outrageous as to lose protection of the Act, was not appropriate. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 4:59 am
Steel Corporation which provides users with step by step guidance for maintaining a corporate compliance program. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:07 pm by Alexis Switzer
  The Board’s recent decision in Lion Elastomers, LLC II, scrapped the Wright Line test and reinstated previous “setting-specific standards aimed at deciding whether an employee has lost the Act’s protections. [read post]