Search for: "State v. Grant" Results 61 - 80 of 68,073
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 11:52 am by Brian Clark
United States, 432 F.2d 1052, 1055 (3d Cir. 1970) [17] The Stalker Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Voting RightsThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Will Baude
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
 A motion by the defendant under this subdivision does not constitute an appearance in the action.Given the lender’s failure to provide “sufficient cause for the delay,” the AD1 thought that the requested relief should have been granted, and the action dismissed.That sure foreclosed that ….# # #DECISIONWells Fargo Bank, N.A. v G. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
The California Supreme Court should grant review of this Court of Appeal opinion. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As stated in Luxul Technology Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:58 am by Amy Howe
” The justices granted two other petitions for review on Monday: Bouarfa v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Douglas A. Berman
One theme of my marijuana seminar is how the US Supreme Court has largely stayed out of broad legal uncertainties relating to marijuana reform for the past two decades (after very significant early rulings in United States v. [read post]