Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V D. A. B, Appellant" Results 61 - 80 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am by Josh Blackman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in King v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Conditional cross-petition for certiorari Brief for Cross-Respondents Morgan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
§ 547(b); (2) whether criminal restitution, which is ordered to further the state's goals of deterrence and rehabilitation, is “to or for the benefit of a creditor” under 11 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Both the appellant (in both cases) and respondent II in T 1513/17 requested, inter alia, that questions concerning the validity of priority rights be referred to the Enlarged Board. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:50 am by STEPHEN HOLZER
Twenty-three states and other petitioners challenged the Agency's refusal to consider costs of emissions reduction in a Washington D.C. circuit court, which sided with the EPA, then again at a D.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:36 pm
The others on the panel are appellate and trial judges in Washington. [read post]