Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V D. A. B, Appellant"
Results 61 - 80
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:03 pm
Pointing to Rule 11(d)(2)(B), F. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Burwell, 15-191; and Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:35 am
” It is my sense that NFIB v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:50 am
Twenty-three states and other petitioners challenged the Agency's refusal to consider costs of emissions reduction in a Washington D.C. circuit court, which sided with the EPA, then again at a D.C. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:47 am
Carney, Deputy State Solicitor, for Appellant Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Patrick Kasson, Reminger Co. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am
AL., Appellants, v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
B. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
However, Conte was decided by but one of several California appellate courts, and we understand that they don’t have to follow each other’s decisions. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ult [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
§ 2254(d). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
When asked if he reviewed the identical [innovator drug] label before treating [plaintiff], [the prescriber] responded “not in detail, no. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm
CODE §31-13-13, prohibiting a state’s residents from: (a) concealing or harboring aliens who are present in the United States in violation of federal law; (b) encouraging or inducing aliens to enter into or reside in the state, when their entry or residence would violate federal law; or (c) transporting unlawfully present aliens within the state in furtherance of their unlawful presence. [read post]
