Search for: "State of Maine v. Davis" Results 61 - 80 of 389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
Also on Tuesday, Justice Stephen Breyer rejected a request from Maine Republicans asking the court to block the state from using ranked-choice voting in next month’s presidential election. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
App. 127, 189 N.W.2d 879 (1971), reversed on other grounds, 389 Mich. 249, 205 N.W.2d 431 (1973); Davis v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
Wilkerson Davis & Wilkerson, P.C. wilkerson@dwlaw.com (512) 482 0614 addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.karlbayer.com%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D134'; addthis_title = 'Glen+Wilkerson+on+Hall+Street+v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
Davis, 47 M.J. 484, 486 (C.A.A.F. 1998); accord United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Law enforcement, he said, "is on a teleogical path toward a surveillance state" and the Fourth Amendment is the main bulwark pushing back against that trajectory. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am by Kalvis Golde
Briefly: At The Oklahoman (via How Appealing), Chris Casteel reports that in a brief filed last week in McGirt v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
But you keep straying from the point of the main post, and want to argue the history of racial discrimination. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 6:37 am
Perhaps there were occasional cases of this sort (and if there were, under the doctrine of Davis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:27 pm
  Our firm recently published an advisory on this new law in Maine (see the Davis Wright Tremaine advisory here) which prohibits all direct marketing to minors under the age of 18, with no exceptions. [read post]