Search for: "State of N.D. v. EPA"
Results 61 - 80
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 7:19 am
LEXIS 27903 (N.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:56 am
PG&E (N.D. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
Supp. 224, 272 (N.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:29 am
EEOC, 2021 WL 5449038 (N.D. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
OneWest Bank, FSB, No. 12 C 6380, 2013 WL 212926 (N.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:30 am
EPA, 142 S. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
On a related note, our friends at Kelley Green Law Blog wrote about EPA’s recent release of PFAS data and plans to eliminate a de minimis exemption for PFAS here. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Supp. 3d 1291 (N.D. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:31 am
Cal. 2003); and Mid-States Coalition for Progress v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:29 am
Cal. 2003); and Mid-States Coalition for Progress v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
EPA, 573 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
The Noise Control Act contains the finding that “The Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States to promote an environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
Supp.2d 1347, 1370 (N.D. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
EPA. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal affirmed the District Court’s adoption of the plurality view of the “Waters of the United States” in Rapanos v. [read post]