Search for: "State v. Books"
Results 61 - 80
of 15,979
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2016, 5:01 am
In the recent decision of Amalgamated Bank v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest of the United States of America Regarding Proposed Class Settlement in the Google Books case, The Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
§3500), Brady v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
In the recent decision of Mehta v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 12:30 am
Williams's Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement before Roe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:52 am
States have the right to call an Article V convention without the concurrence of the Congress whenever two-thirds of the states wish to participate. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
”). [3] Bench Book at 137; see also id. at 162. [4] Bench Book at 148. [5] Bench Book at 160. [6] Bench Book at 152. [7] Bench Book at 233, quoting Daubert v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Pamela Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, & Artemus Ward, The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (Stanford Law Books, May 2013) Drawing on data from the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
See Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm
Continuing the theme of balancing copyright and other fundamental rights, from this Kat’s previous book review, she now turns to Emily Hudson’s Drafting Copyright Exceptions: From the Law in Books to the Law in Action, which was also nominated in the IPKat book of year awards for best copyright book.Law in books v law in action Hudson, Reader at King’s College London, introduces her book by stating that we need a… [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
The book includes yet a further part (Part V) which includes only one chapter dedicated to a comparative study of the examination of the inventive step criteria. [read post]
Book Chapter: “From the Welfare State to the Militarized Market: Losing Choices, Controlling Losers”
7 Jun 2011, 4:59 am
Book Chapter: Martha T. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:56 am
According to Our Hearts Rhinelander v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm
Jeannette Cockroft has reviewed Keira V. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:30 am
United States, and Radice v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:40 pm
Under State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:26 pm
Cox, Sam Houston State University, has published Gibbons v. [read post]
