Search for: "State v. CC"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2009, 10:22 pm
Bosse v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:22 pm
Bosse v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
In a 4-3 per curiam decision, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Ramanda Houston v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
No. 4587-CC (Del. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
Image [cc] cseeman That celebratory sound you heard from your local library today was your librarian reading the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:41 pm
Georgia law upholds the Declaration of a homeowners association as a binding contract that cannot be altered by a trial court award unless prohibited by a statute according to the precedent set in Summit at Scarborough Homeowners Association v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:24 pm
Ponsoldt, No. 174-CC (Del. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Questioning if the employer knew or should have known of its employee's propensity for sexual misconduct defeats the employer's motion for summary judgmentJohansmeyer v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2018 NY Slip Op 06518, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentAnthony Johansmeyer and others [Petitioners] sued the New York City Department of Education and the City of New York [jointly DOE] and Child Center of New York [CC] to recover damages for negligent hiring,… [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Questioning if the employer knew or should have known of its employee's propensity for sexual misconduct defeats the employer's motion for summary judgmentJohansmeyer v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2018 NY Slip Op 06518, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentAnthony Johansmeyer and others [Petitioners] sued the New York City Department of Education and the City of New York [jointly DOE] and Child Center of New York [CC] to recover damages for negligent hiring,… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Pa. 1997); United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Pa. 1997); United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:31 am
Brown, CC 9903-02495 (Or. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:05 pm
Smith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:14 pm
Instead of articulating what exactly the confrontation clause requires of the State when offering lab reports into evidence, the Court merely stated, in a per curiam opinion,"We vacate the judgment of the Supreme Court of Virginia and remand the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 3:30 am
Yesterday, the Court unanimously concluded in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:06 pm
It is hard to believe that nearly 6 years have elapsed since the Supreme Court heard the appeals in Ali and others v Birmingham CC (our note here), where the Court decided that a decision on a homelessness application involving a dispute of fact was not a determination of a civil right under Art 6(1) ECHR. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:49 am
Hobbs on the State of Nature;The import of Corfield v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
Action No. 3447-CC (Del. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:41 am
Legal Services Commission Northumberland CC & Anr v. [read post]
