Search for: "State v. Community Distributors"
Results 61 - 80
of 565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:28 am
Galvan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:41 am
(Lemmon v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
The company communicated to the sales team a desire to promote Genotropin for off-label use in violation of Pharmacia's formal policy. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
In Morrissey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:05 am
Nike v. [read post]
Medical Device Cases Brightened by Recent U.S. Court of Appeals Decision; Stengel v. Medtronic, Inc.
12 Oct 2013, 9:00 am
In a series of previous cases dating back to 2008, defendants, manufacturers and distributors of medical devices were armed with preemption defenses as a result of the cases of Riegel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am
Meanwhile, amid a spate of arrests by the California State Highway Patrol of marijuana delivery drivers and seizure of their cannabis company goods, the California Office of Administrative Law issued a ruling last week issued a ruling clarifying how marijuana distributors should move about the state. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
From Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
According to the Court: Pursuant to paragraph 3(1)(f) and section 27 of the Copyright Act, the appellants, as creators and distributors of television programs, have the sole right to communicate these works to the public by telecommunication and to authorize such act. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am
Maybe Epic v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:52 am
” Interestingly, in a separate part of the complaint, Reliance allows that “the OIG is currently investigating Reliance, and its physicians with whom Reliance previously communicated. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
. are distributors, like the pharmacy. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
F.T.C., 440 U.S. 69, 80 (1979); United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 6:57 pm
Moreover, the distribution agreement often provides assistance to the distributor regarding access to advertising, communicating know-how by means of training or yet even payment facilities. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:37 pm
” Device distributors in particular should watch this little gem. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 8:09 pm
CLC v. [read post]
