Search for: "State v. David C. Taylor"
Results 61 - 80
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Saywell Colonial Justice: Justice, Morality and Crime in the Niagara District, 1791-1849 by David Murray Canadian State Trials Volume Two: Rebellion and Invasion in the Canadas, 1837-8 edited by F. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
In 1876, lawyer and legal publisher Carl Jahn published the first issue of the Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin, a precursor of the Ohio State Bar Journal, and solicited Ohio lawyers to submit “law points of general interest. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
Engagement problem b/c audience expects high quality. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
A: 110(2) by the way: very difficult for us in digital education space: mediated instruction activities that use work as integral part of class experience under control of instructor analogous to type of performance that would take place live—really problematic b/c the key learning activities are not the type that would happen live. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Circle C Construction, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
David Welkowitz: how do you get around free riders? [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Law Center) Eugene Volokh (UCLA School of Law) David Welkowitz (Whittier Law School) A PDF of the brief is here, but I enclose the bulk of the text below: SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The panel decision in this case followed the majority opinion in In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation (“Keller v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
C. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
This post talks about a list of about 120 books on the "black experience" that Judge Don Young ordered to be placed into the Marion, Ohio prison library back in 1972, Taylor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Bogard, April K., Candace C. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
Purdum v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
(f/k/a Plimus).David J. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
