Search for: "State v. David W. Stevens" Results 61 - 80 of 302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin observes that “[w]hether in majority or dissent, Justice Stevens represented a pragmatic approach that dominated legal thinking in the 20th century. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
Thaddeus Stevens,18 wanted to grant freed slaves full civil rights, both out of moral sentiment and to create a Republican power base.19 The “black codes”20 and laws that denied freedmen entry into the states21 hampered the Radicals’ goals, as did Supreme Court precedent favoring states rights (often regarding slavery).22 After President Johnson vetoed23 a civil rights bill24 that would have eliminated the black codes, Stevens sought to usurp power from… [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.16 After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard argument in Nielsen v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jeff Ifrah and David Yellen look at Murphy v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
At Law360 (subscription required), Alex Wolf reports that in Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Abbott v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Indeed, a far better predictor of a justice’s vote is the justice’s ideology, rather than whether a justice uses a methodology like originalism or not to decide a case (think of Scalia and Justice John Paul Stevens in the District of Columbia v. [read post]