Search for: "State v. Delta Air Lines, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
(IP Whiteboard) Summary judgment Delta blow: Virgin Atlantic Airways v Delta Air Lines [2011] EWCA Civ 162; and Virgin Atlantic Airways v Premium Aircraft Interiors (IPKat) Half a million PCC damages cap likely from 14 June (PatLit) Pioneers, pirates and parvenus – IP v Innovation (IPKat) Rockwool fire ads held unlawful: EWHC (Ch) decision in trademark dispute Kingspan Group plc v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
 The Court of Appeal held that "only if no other possible construction is possible would a skilled man be forced to conclude that the patentee had claimed that which he knew was old" (Beloit Technologies Inc v Valmet Paper [1995] RPC 705 at 720). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 10:26 am by zamansky
” Indeed, since Fifth Third replaced the previous “presumption of prudence” standard, a number of these so-called “stock drop” cases have been relitigated, but most have resulted in judgments for the defendants, including BP and Delta Air Lines, Lehman and GM. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Within many companies, supply chain management is on the front lines of negotiating contracts and letters of intent. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Tomorrow: An alternative—narrow, specifically defined exceptions for particular kinds of speech. [1] Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Conshor, Inc., 832 So. 2d 166, 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 326 F.3d 1183, 1185 (11th Cir. 2003) (“conclusory allegations, unwarranted factual deductions or legal conclusions masquerading as facts will not prevent dismissal”); Dickson v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm by Pace Law School Library
  Blowing hot air:  an analysis of state involvement in greenhouse gas litigation. [read post]