Search for: "State v. Eis"
Results 61 - 80
of 536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2007, 2:42 pm
Perez, 297 F.3d at 1268 (stating that Perez used the rule "to harass the other side . . . with the wild-eyed hope that the other side w[ould] fail to answer and therefore admit essential elements"). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
” Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
” Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 1:34 pm
It expected the EIS to be ready in January 2009. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:58 am
EIS, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:41 pm
" The Appeals Court also denied a request by the Township for a supplemental EIS, saying, "Where new information merely confirms the agency's original analysis, no supplemental EIS is indicated. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 4:43 am
Frosty Treats Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
As a result, the district court remanded to the Forest Service, instructing it to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) assessing the sound impact of the proposed trail routes on the adjoining wilderness area, and also enjoined the Forest Service from conducting any further activity on the proposed trail pending its completion of the EIS. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:15 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1:16-cv-01796-JEB: “MINUTE ORDER: As explained in open court following today’s hearing, the Court ORDERS that Dakota Access’s 80 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED and its Motion for Preliminary Injunction is WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 1:48 pm
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:32 pm
In Jamul Action Committee v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:01 am
You may consider the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in 671122 Ontario Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:01 am
You may consider the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in 671122 Ontario Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Ctr. for Food Safety v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
"It appears that at least some in the Senate also support adding trustees.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:17 am
In Matter of Bronx Committee for Toxic Free Schools v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:17 am
In Matter of Bronx Committee for Toxic Free Schools v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:12 am
., San Luis Obispo Mothers For Peace, the State of New York, and amicus State of California (Petitioners) challenge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC or Commission) modification of the Design Basis Threat (DBT) rule and partial denial of the Committee to Bridge the Gap's (CBG) petition for rulemaking. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:21 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
