Search for: "State v. F. T."
Results 61 - 80
of 18,286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 2:16 pm
In Eisenhauer v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
I hadn't considered it in any detail (and didn't realize, for example, that it was prospective only). [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
“(f) Service by Special Order of Court. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 8:56 am
.'"] From State v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
” 959 F.3d at 50. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stating that it had never directly addressed the question and citing Daimler7 and Magill v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
LinkedIn Corp., 639 F. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
M&F Worldwide Corp. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:14 am
Co., 6 A.D.2d 780, 175 N.Y.S.2d 86 (1st Dep't 1958) 3 W9/PHC Real Estate LP v. [read post]