Search for: "State v. Frank L. Little" Results 61 - 80 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
The Court is there-fore reluctant to grant relief that, at this point, would have little practical effect. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
Before we answer that, we want to be quite frank about our positions on off-label use and manufacturer promotion of it. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Carl Custer
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
We’ll be waiting a little while to see if the CJEU agrees. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
(Marc Frank, China's exports to Cuba slump as island's cash crunch deepens, Reuters (6 December 2017)). [read post]