Search for: "State v. Good" Results 61 - 80 of 49,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am by Peter A. Mahler
Some nine years ago I wrote about an LLC dissolution case titled Goldstein v Pikus decided by former Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Charles Ramos which also involved a bitter dispute between two estranged co-managing members of a realty-holding LLC. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
Pornhub * Catching Up on Recent FOSTA Developments (None of Them Good) * Section 230 Preempts Claims Against Omegle–M.H. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
That pro-contact culture is articulated and repeated in both pre-and post-2014 caselaw: essentially that contact is almost always a good thing and will almost always be ordered in some shape or form[8] – a far broader proposition than the statutory presumption. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]