Search for: "State v. Graber" Results 61 - 80 of 405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:31 pm by Josh Blackman
I'm sure the Justices were annoyed that Judges Canby, Graber, and Friedland wasted everyone's time. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 11:44 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
The CFPB’s counsel also argued that the Ninth Circuit should follow its decision in CFPB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
  (Full disclosure:  I was happy to write an enthusiastic Foreword to the book, and Balkinization regular Mark Graber also contributed a strong blurb, as did University of Virginia history professor emeritus Peter Onuf.In some ways, the book can be compared to the Declaration of Independence. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by JB
" To take only one example: Marshall's holding in McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Although advisory opinions have been prohibited in American federal courts since the late eighteenth century, several state supreme courts do accept requests for advisory opinions from state legislatures and/or the governor. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  For instance, in light of Mark Graber’s pathbreaking study of Dred Scott (a work too many constitutional scholars have apparently not yet read), a good example is simply accepting the Republican critique of that infamous decision as if there were no case to be made against African American citizenship prior to the adoption of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Should the rules of constitutional amendment in Article V be interpreted strictly, even if this legalistic interpretation holds back the realization of equality embedded in the formative texts of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence, the Reconstruction Dismerberments, and the many franchise-expanding constitutional changes since then? [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm by Guest Blogger
As evidence of this trend, consider the Court’s decision in American Legion v. [read post]