Search for: "State v. Honorable" Results 61 - 80 of 7,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Will Korn
Borderud is a fellow of the Texas Bar Foundation, a member of the State Bar of Texas Local Bar Services Committee, and a master of the bench in the Judge Abner V. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Olivas (University of Houston Law Center) & Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia (The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law) have posted Plyler v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 6:15 pm
The Wyoming Attorney General's Office recently completed examination of the other 49 states statutes for the purpose of honoring concealed firearms permits issued by another state, or reciprocity. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:47 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: OP 11-0206, 2011 MT 97N, THE OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Petitioner, v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 12:10 pm
Rebekah Daniel served honorably as a Lieutenant in the United States Navy, and she worked as a labor and delivery nurse stationed at the Naval Hospital in Bremerton, Washington. . . . [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:08 pm by Jon
The question has been raised, essentially, "Is it honorable to take an oath to support a constitution, not only in its present state, but however it may be amended according to its amendment clause? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
GE Wins at Federal Circuit in Mitsubishi Wind Turbine CaseOn Friday, July 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
As such, she was an ideal choice for the AWLA’s 2015 Ruth V. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm by Matt Murphy
” That’s the first line from Justice Kennedy’s plurality opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm by Ryan Scoville
Instead, the Court held that Section 229(a) didn’t apply because the statutory language was too ambiguous to overcome a presumption that Congress ordinarily intends to honor the reserved powers of the states. [read post]