Search for: "State v. Lucente"
Results 61 - 80
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2011, 5:14 pm
Cir. 2003) and Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:38 pm
Nokia has made no allusion that it believes its shares are undervalued, stating that the repurchases are only part of its ongoing capital structure optimisation program, which it has invested a total of €7 billion in since October 2015, mainly for de-leveraging purposes as a consequence of the Alcatel-Lucent acquisition.While it is fair to assume Nokia did not believe its shares were undervalued at the time, the evidence tends to suggest otherwise. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Courts and regulators provided some clarification (in Microsoft v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Lucent Techs., Inc., 388 F.Supp.2d 590, 596-597 (M.D.N.C.2005); Melton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
The touchstone became economic evidence (see Lucent v Gateway, ResQnet v Lansa, Uniloc v Microsoft). [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Lucent Technologies, Inc., 2005 WL 2145911, at *3 (M.D. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 9:19 am
” Lucent Techs., 580 F.3d at 1334. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
Lucente of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:55 am
Lucente of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm
Lucente v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Alcatel-Lucent, 441 F.Supp.3d 68 (E.D. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:43 am
(IPblog) Lucent Technologies – Third party software add-in cannot be used as proxy for valuing patented software component: Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
The implementer is RealTek Semiconductor; the patent holder is Agere, which was spun off of Lucent in 2000 and acquired by Taiwanese integrated circuit designer and supplier LSI, another party to this action, in 2001.In a decision strongly inspired by Judge James Robart's anti-enforcement injunction (concerning a German SEP injunction) in Microsoft v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:54 am
Lucente of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:54 am
Quanta and Lucent v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:18 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:12 am
”(emphases added)); Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity:… [read post]
