Search for: "State v. Max" Results 61 - 80 of 1,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 5:54 am
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to consider arguments in the Pennsylvania case of Mallory v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:33 am
Rainer Klump (Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main) & Miloš Vec (Max-Planck-Institut für europäische Rechtsgeschichte) have published Völkerrecht und Weltwirtschaft im 19. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
EST, the Society will host Making Minimum Wage: Elsie Parrish v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
In this post, Liz Jackson, Trainee Solicitor, and Max Wiktorsson, Associate, in the Employment Team at CMS, comment on the decision from the Supreme Court in Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee and Anor. [2023] UKSC 43. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:40 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court Sides with Vaccine Manufacturers in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
This is what he writes:The Proposal for a Directive on Trade Secrets: the Max Planck Institute (MPI) comments Having published a first opinion on a proposed Directive on the Protection of Trade Secrets on 12 May (only available in German, here) on 3 June, the Max Planck Institute has now made its comments available on the latest version of the proposal (on which see Alberto Bellan's post here). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 12:23 pm by CJ Haddick
In affirming summary judgment in favor of American States, Justice Max Baer rejected Ford’s argument that the form she signed violated Section 1731, and cited to Robinson V. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 12:08 am
 The Supreme Court issued the opinion in Erlinger v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:45 am
Here are some NY state cases this week in Legal Malpractice:1.Max Markus Katz, et al., appellants, v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., respondent. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Together the firms, which received $4.3 million in incentives, had promised to create 161 jobs.Of some facts about the legal disagreement previously discussed on IPBiz, note the following text within MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 3:08 am
Armin von Bogdandy (Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht) & Ingo Venzke (Univ. of Amsterdam - Law) have posted On the Functions of International Courts: An Appraisal in Light of Their Burgeoning Public Authority. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]