Search for: "State v. Ping"
Results 61 - 80
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:02 am
In People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:28 pm
The case is UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:52 am
Affirmed.Case Name: RAYMOND ALEXANDER VERHEYDT v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 10:40 am
State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 10:40 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:20 pm
Almonor in Massachusetts and a case called State of Maine v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals this week found in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 2:24 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:03 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
The issue was ping-ponged back and forth between bankruptcy and state court. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:22 pm
State was "Did the State violate the Fourth Amendment by acquiring from the phone company, without a warrant, the defendant’s cell phone records that revealed information (tower-pings, outgoing and incoming communication, etc.) connecting him to a murder? [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:03 pm
In State of Maine v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:37 am
Smith v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Further, as the court held in Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, 121 AD3d 559, a department policy does not trump the probationary period established by law or by a rule or regulations having the force and effect of law. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
In Farina v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:13 am
In Ping v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:01 pm
Via Above the Law, from Richard Posner: "Litigation is not ping-pong. [read post]