Search for: "State v. Ping" Results 61 - 80 of 335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2022, 3:43 am by jonathanturley
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:52 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: RAYMOND ALEXANDER VERHEYDT v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:22 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
State was "Did the State violate the Fourth Amendment by acquiring from the phone company, without a warrant, the defendant’s cell phone records that revealed information (tower-pings, outgoing and incoming communication, etc.) connecting him to a murder? [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 Further, as the court held in Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, 121 AD3d 559,  a  department policy does not trump the probationary period established by law or by a rule or regulations having the force and effect of law. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:01 pm by Kim Krawiec
Via Above the Law, from Richard Posner: "Litigation is not ping-pong. [read post]