Search for: "State v. Sikorski" Results 61 - 80 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm by Enrico Bonadio
The impact of Huawei v ZTE Since the seminal 2015 CJEU case of Huawei v ZTE (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies, EU:C:2015:477)) the importance of a harmonised approach to FRAND across EU member states has become obvious. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:06 am by Clara Apt
Climate Change and the Courts Greenhouse Gaslighting: Deceptive Moderation and West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Are the UPCA and the ratification laws compatible with the State’s duty to protect constitutional identity? [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:14 pm by John Collins
On 14 November 2018, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Warner-Lambert Company LLC (Appellant) v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan and another (Respondents) [2018] UKSC 56. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
‘Should proceedings before the future UPC not comply with the standards of treatment under an IIA, which was signed by a Contracting Member State to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), the investor whose rights under the IIA would be infringed by acts of the UPC could initiate arbitral proceedings on the basis of the IIA against the Contracting Member State. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:21 am by Miquel Montañá
This view was rejected by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body in its panel of 17 March 2000 (EC v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:06 am by Laurence Lai
Filing and examination fee discounts extended to joint applicants A 30% reduction for the filing and examination fees is available for entitled applicants such as SMEs, natural persons and universities from an EPC contracting state having an official language different from one of the official languages of the EPO. [read post]