Search for: "State v. Sitting Crow"
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
This is the case for law-making pursuant to Article I, Section 7, for admitting new states to the union pursuant to Article IV, Section 3, and even for calling a new constitutional convention pursuant to Article V. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:30 am
With the 60th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm
Northeastern State University). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
Reports state that calm has since been restored to the area. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:11 pm
I'm an opponent of the administrative state. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
” Frustration and Persistence for Activists on the 56th Anniversary of the Voting Rights MSN – Vanessa Williams (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The 1965 Voting Rights Act is considered the most significant achievement of the civil rights movement because it removed Jim Crow-era laws that blocked the vast majority of Black people from voting, especially in the South. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am
Co., 653 N.W.2d 323, 331 (Iowa 2002) (stating injury “must be related to the working environment or the conditions of employment”); Griffith v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Did it merely eliminate state laws that either mandated or permitted school segregation? [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
” Plessy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
Police officers could simply sit by as a crowd formed and became agitated. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
Police officers could simply sit by as a crowd formed and became agitated. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:04 am
They should be free to sit it out as neutrals. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases such as Ward v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
Because Jim Crow laws were overturned, black CEOs today run Fortune 500 companies. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Their oral traditions, often told sitting around a campfire in the Canadian north, became part of my own Roots. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
A year ago, almost to the day, my (co-authored) Verdict column focused on the lessons to be learned from a high-profile and boisterous protest by Stanford Law School students at a Federalist Society Speaker Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
