Search for: "State v. Smart"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2025, 9:01 pm
Twombly, a civil procedure case in which Souter wrote the Court’s majority opinion applying the plausibility pleading requirement to antitrust claims, and United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 am
The court cited Nava v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:08 am
" Snap Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 6:30 am
A ruling last week by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Citizens Bank v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
The Court stated that the focus of the appeal is the crossing rules, but it is important to read them in context. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:08 pm
California, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:57 pm
In Smart Options, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:44 am
Lawsuits over voice-activated assistants (and other smart home devices) are interesting. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 12:22 pm
You're smart. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Riley v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:26 am
In 2014, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:51 pm
In a posting on the Official Google Blog, Drummond states: …Android’s success has yielded something else: a hostile, organized campaign against Android by Microsoft, Oracle, Apple and other companies, waged through bogus patents. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
Recent decisions by Administrative Law Judges of the NYC Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsHuman Resources Administration v Smart, OATH Index No. 1325/16NYC Dept. of Transportation v Harris, OATH Index No. 1531/16 Matter of Smart: In the Smart case, OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin F. [read post]
20 Apr 2025, 3:09 pm
McGarry, Common Interests and Common Spaces: Visions of the Past and Future of International Justice Sarah Thin, ‘Proxy States’ as Champions of the Common Interest? [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:56 am
Chevron/FedEx Appeal Voluntarily Dismissed: Smart But Problematic Tactical Move Here's news from this blog by Prof. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 5:58 am
As the smart phone wars continue to rage across the world, the verdict in the Apple v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
Washington should be retroactively applied to two state defendants, Troy Smart and Henry Douglas, whose sentences were final before June 24, 2004, when Blakely was decided. [read post]
