Search for: "State v. Taylor E."
Results 61 - 80
of 718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2018, 12:00 pm
Taylor-v-Double-Complaint [read post]
26 May 2013, 2:50 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
Taylor Are you a parent corporation with a subsidiary that does business with a state or local government? [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:46 pm
Check the Bloate v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
TAYLOR v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
Stitt, consolidated for argument with United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:55 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:12 am
[W]hile Patent Owner’s argument that the United States 'directed and controlled the allegedly infringing activity' is not without relevance, it does not bear directly on the categories identified by the Supreme Court in [Taylor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 6:33 am
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
Since the language of the applicable state statutes was broad and not equivalent to a federal predicate offense, Supreme Court precedent -Taylor v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:43 am
State of Indiana (NFP) John Taylor v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:21 am
New York State Appellate Division, Second Department: McCabe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
§ 2241 if his state conviction for sale of marijuana is found not to be a “controlled substance offense” under Taylor, Deschamps, and Mathis. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:27 am
") AC35133 - Taylor v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:21 pm
United States and Shepard v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
” [See, also, Matter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 87 AD3d 883, an entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its terms.]* See Governor’s Program Bill Mem, Bill Jacket, Chapter 504 of the Laws of, 2009 ** Civil Service Law § 209-a [1] [e]*** Matter of City of Oswego, 21 NY3d 880; Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers… [read post]
