Search for: "State v. Worm" Results 61 - 80 of 208
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jimmy Wales, the Wikipedia co-founder, has argued that an attempt by France to give an online privacy ruling global force is opening up a “disastrous can of worms” and could spur global censorship. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by Jack Goldsmith
  The deployment of the Stuxnet worm to damage 1000 or so Iranian nuclear centrifuges was almost certainly a “use of force” under the Charter. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 March 2016, there was a two day hearing in Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG & ors On 11 March 2016 there was a judgement in the case of Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to the factual findings of Referee Ebrahimoff, Theresa M.'s emotional problems also led her to believe that there were worms in her food and that she had a tapeworm growing inside her. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
– Potenziale und Grenzen des ›Nudging‹ René Rhinow, Vielfalt und Wandel von Minderheiten – eineHerausforderung auch für die Schweiz Nigel Rodley, The Limits of Monism, the Promise of Universality: the Hissène Habré Case Yves Sandoz, Politics and Humanitarian Law: the Worm in the Fruit? [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 And asked that way, it’s clear this challenge opens up numerous cans of worms. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These include digital forensic preservation and investigation, notification of a broad range of third parties and other constituencies,[1] fulfillment of state and federal compliance obligations, potential litigation, engagement with law enforcement, the provision of credit monitoring, crisis management, a communications plan – and the list goes on. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 7:32 am by Jennifer Allison
 Instead, for example, they might have looked like this: According to the caption, this is an “accompanying letter from Kaiser Carl V for Martin Luther for travelling to Worms” from 1521. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]