Search for: "Steven Amaral" Results 61 - 80 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
John Manning had the best response to the Amars. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
As Akhil Amar has observed, "[v]irtually no serious modern scholar - left, right, and center - thinks that [Slaughterhouse] is a plausible reading of the Amendment. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am by Doug Kmiec
" But can it be plausibly argued, as Dean Eastman and perhaps Akhil Amar suggest, that there is another view of originalism in play as well? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm by Derek T. Muller
The Court may be "nonchalant," but, I think, this doctrine in particular is unusually weak as a vehicle for protecting "voting rights" under the Constitution.It’s also consistent with the views of Dean Vik Amar and Professor Jason Mazzone looking at this very case. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:12 pm by Steve Kalar
  For a thoughtful analysis of the tough questions that await WHO, see Vik Amar and Michael Schaps, How Strong is San Francisco’s ‘Sanctuary City’ Lawsuit Against the Trump Administration, available here. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:46 am by William Appleton
McMaster, the Fouad and Michelle Ajami senior fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution; Kathryn Stoner, the Mosbacher director of the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law; and Steven Pifer, nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am by David Gans
  The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment never once lost sight of what Justice John Paul Stevens called “the difference between a ‘No Trespassing’ sign and a welcome mat. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
Also at Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the possible procedural defects in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
Other scholars such as Akhil Amar have made similar arguments. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that at today’s “long conference,” the justices will “sort[] through hundreds of petitions that arrived over the summer. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:12 am by June Casey
Edited or co-edited books include a leading constitutional law casebook, Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking (5th ed. 2006, with Paul Brest, Jack Balkin, Akhil Amar, and Reva Siegel); Reading Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader (1988, with Steven Mallioux); Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment (1995); Constitutional Stupidities, Constitutional Tragedies (1998, with William Eskridge); Legal Canons (2000, with Jack Balkin); The… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am by Amy Howe
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:13 am by Anna Christensen
Amar of the UC Davis School of Law, Jesse H. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:30 pm by Jack Chin
  In 2005, he cited a law review article for a point of sentencing law, and then as an "accord," cited a Stevens and Breyer dissent. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:16 am by Victoria Kwan
The Supreme Court posted a transcript of Stevens’s speech. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:11 am by Tim Zinnecker
The list is organized alphabetically by host school and has been updated since the last list appeared on April 19.Albany:  Megan Fairlie (Florida International) (2010-11)Brooklyn:  Donna Coker (Miami) (Fall 2010)Case Western Reserve:  Tawia Ansah (New England School of Law) (Fall 2010)Charleston:  Angela Laughlin (Texas Tech) (2010-11)Columbia:  Akhil Amar (Yale) (Fall 2010); Jody Kraus (Virginia) (2010-11); Daniel Rodriguez (Texas) (Spring 2011); Olivier de… [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 12:22 pm
"I.e., Jack Rakove, who of course won a Pulitzer Prize in history and has taught American history at Stanford for decades, believes that the Stevens opinion, whatever its inadequacies, is less egregious than is Scalia's, which may be true. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:02 am by Laura Appleman
  New additions have two red stars next to the name.Albany:  Megan Fairlie (Florida International) (2010-11)Brooklyn:  Donna Coker (Miami) (Fall 2010)Case Western Reserve:  Tawia Ansah (New England School of Law) (Fall 2010)Charleston:  Angela Laughlin (Texas Tech) (2010-11)Columbia:  Akhil Amar (Yale) (Fall 2010); Jody Kraus (Virginia) (2010-11); Daniel Rodriguez (Texas) (Spring 2011); Olivier de Schutter (Université de Louvain Collège)… [read post]