Search for: "Stewart v. Rogers" Results 61 - 80 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2015, 6:41 am by Elina Saxena
Wells  also  linked to the United States’ en banc petition in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:14 pm by Georgialee Lang
Not so in the United States where Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Martha Stewart and others faced charges, not for steroid use or securities fraud, but for lying. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:20 am by Quinta Jurecic
Stewart Baker posted the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:47 am
Posner Roger Alford, reviewing Litigating War: Mass Civil Injury and the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission, by Sean D. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am by Quinta Jurecic
This week’s Lawfare Podcast featured a discussion of another crucial military commissions case, Al Bahlul v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Professor Hamish Stewart, in his 1996 paper for the Conference, described a trend in law to increasing the scope of admissibility ofevidence and an increasing reliance on the decision-makers to assign appropriate weight, but he did not support legislating this task. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr provided audio of this week’s oral arguments in Klayman v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Michael Knapp shared news that defendants in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court released its decision in Ralls v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Ritika Singh
Matt Danzer pored through the transcripts of yesterday’s military commissions motions hearing in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by Ronald Collins
It was a paper I wrote with Todd Gaziano of Heritage . . . and very importantly [with] Nathaniel Stewart . . . . [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]