Search for: "Stone v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
On November 21, a federal court in Minnesota also preliminarily enjoined the ban in Stone v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:57 am
The case is Stone v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court case, Burwell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court case, Burwell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court case, Burwell v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
Wash., No. 2:17-cv-01297; and Stone v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Circuit’s ruling in Jaber v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
On the same day, Roberts made headlines in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, when he told the audience at a District of Columbia Circuit judicial conference that pop-culture references can be an effective way of making a point. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
One case was Masses Publishing Co v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm
That statute declares, "Whenever property subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States is located in a foreign country, or has been detained or seized pursuant to legal process or competent authority of a foreign government, an action or proceeding for forfeiture may be brought . . . in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
On 28 October 2016 Haddon-Cave J handed down judgment in the case of Begg v BBC ([2016] EWHC 2688 (QB)) [pdf]. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
”As a member of the board of the Historical Society for the District of Columbia Circuit, I’m always pleased when I spot someone using one of the Society’s valuable oral history. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
Leon informed the plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
The case is currently on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am
This ruling comes on the heels of the District of Columbia Circuit’s holding that state anti-SLAPP laws can’t be invoked in federal court. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
California, 554 U.S. 353, 358–61 (2008) (admissibility of hearsay); District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
Tile & Stone, Inc., 92 USPQ2d 1366, 1372 (TTAB 2009). [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
District Judge Richard J. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:19 pm
Stone, Hudson v. [read post]
