Search for: "Sullivan v Clarke" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Clark; and must be accompanied by “a detailed explanation based on the record,” Clemons v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 3:21 am by SHG
Sullivan, and a federal judge’s holding almost certainly made the burden insurmountable. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  Fallon, Meltzer, and Shapiro refer to the Court's "varying rubrics," which is an apt description.The most pernicious of the varying rubrics was Justice Douglas's opinion for the Court in Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The High Court ruled that the BBC could film and broadcast an interview with Babar Ahmad, a terrorism suspect who has been detained in the UK without a trial for seven years, after the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke refused permission. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am by thelawprofessor
Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P., New York (Nicole A. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
": Kathleen Clark, Washington U. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Canada The libel claim by former British Columbia Liberal leader Gordon Wilson against Bruce Ralston, Premier John Horgan, MP Rachel Blaney and others concerning his job performance as advocate for the LNG, or liquefied natural gas, program during Christy Clark’s Liberal government has been listed for a 10 week trial beginning on 14 April 2020. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am by Ackerman Law Office
The court concluded that defendant had never establish that the learned treatise was a “reliable authority” as required under Wilson vs Clark. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am by INFORRM
Sullivan (2024), Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2024-52. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36] (O’Donnell J)… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm by Jack McNeill
The nursing standard of care in Illinois: rethinking the Wingo exception in the wake of …  (Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Geoffrey Manne
It’s data that Google even has some social context for thanks to older Google Profile features, as Sullivan points out. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
  Government Whistleblowers; Implications of Garcetti v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
 Keith Sullivan Team Members: Arthur Muller (3L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Kiera Fitzpatrick (3L), Alex Zugaro (3L) The competition involved a criminal case of the United States of America v. [read post]