Search for: "Taylor v. Board of Education"
Results 61 - 80
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Establishing seniority rights in the course of collective bargainingBregman v East Ramapo Cent. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Further, said the court, "the arbitration of this grievance would offend public policy" as might otherwise be required by a collective bargaining agreement" would significantly lessen the efficacy of the Hatch Act and frustrate its purpose and scope, citing Matter of Board of Education [Ramapo] 41 NY2d 527. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Further, said the court, "the arbitration of this grievance would offend public policy" as might otherwise be required by a collective bargaining agreement" would significantly lessen the efficacy of the Hatch Act and frustrate its purpose and scope, citing Matter of Board of Education [Ramapo] 41 NY2d 527. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:55 am
Board of Education, 46 AD2d 360, affirmed 38 NY2d 897. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
" * See Matter of Buffalo Teachers Fedn., Inc. v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:26 am
In Chautauqua, the courts considered a corollary to this prohibition: prohibited subjects of arbitration.Although the Taylor mandates that a public employer to bargain with employee organizations and to enter written agreements concerning the terms and conditions of employment and may agree to submit disputes to binding arbitration, this is permitted only in "the absence of 'plain and clear' prohibitions in statute or controlling decision[al] law, or restrictive public… [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
As it is well settled that the tenure rights of teachers are a matter of public interest, the notice of claim provisions of Education Law §3813(1) are not applicable to cases seeking to enforce such [Sephton v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of New York, 99 AD2d 509, 510 (2d Dept), appeal denied 62 NY2d 605]. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
With speakers Wiebke Baars (from Taylor Wessing's Hamburg office) and Michael Edenborough QC (Serle Court), panellists Paul Stevens (Olswang LLP), Anna Carboni (Redd; till recently an Appointed Person) and Mark Owen (Taylor Wessing), it's bound to be both educational and entertaining. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
Employer's setting out the nature of acts of misconduct that adversely impact upon the "efficiency of the service" criticalDoe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Lansing Board of Education, No. 138401. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.* Matter of the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical,… [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.* Matter of the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical,… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:23 am
In addition, the court concluded that the penalty imposed met the Pell standard [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222] as it was “not shocking to one’s sense of fairness” in view of the offenses for which Ernst was found guilty.The question of back salary and benefits, however, was another matters. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
For example, in Matter of the Board of Education of the Unadilla Valley Central School District, 97 AD3d 1078, the Appellate Division held that a disciplinary settlement agreement that provided that the appointing authority waived its right to bring certain charges against an individual barred it from subsequently bring charges based on the same event[s] or omission[s] while in Shuler v State of New York, 48 AD3d 384, the court sustained a provision in a disciplinary… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Monroe County Board of Education, The Court held that one-on-one peer conduct implicated Title IX only is it was “severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive. [read post]
