Search for: "Thom v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 1:45 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection In the case of R (P) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 321, the Court of Appeal held that the revised statutory scheme for the disclosure of convictions required further amendment as its operation in individual cases remained deficient. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 11:40 am
Meanwhile, in Euskadia Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
I culled these tidbits that I thought were interesting: Among the ten cases that Judge Gorsuch identified as the most significant of his judicial career is United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
I culled these tidbits that I thought were interesting: Among the ten cases that Judge Gorsuch identified as the most significant of his judicial career is United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
Also on Schillings Jane Ashford-Thom has published a guide to combating clickbait: Part One and Part Two. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
As Thom Lambert argues in chapter six, the Court has shown a greater willingness to use antitrust to police horizontal restraints of trade than vertical restraints or unilateral conduct. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:50 pm
The European Court of Human Rights recently delivered a damning judgment in Zakharov v Russia [2015] ECHR 1065) (see Inforrm’s post here) holding that the Russian state’s mass surveillance scheme was an unlawful interference with the Applicant’s Article 10 rights and is set to consider the issue again in a case brought by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism with interventions from several major media organisations. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
Cleland Thom argues in the Press Gazette that this is no surprise. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:10 am
In two recent decisions, Fordham v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:51 pm
Updated information on the state of Ohio’s response to the petition in Henry v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm
There is a piece about this by Cleland Thom in the Press Gazette. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:52 pm
UPDATE: Additional thoughts from Thom Lambert and Megan McArdle. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:56 am
No. 1 is R v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:48 am
Thom McAn Shoe Co., 988 F.2d 1117, 1125 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:28 am
According to U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Awuku, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3298 (Admin) - QBD President names and shames 3 solicitors who failed disclosure duties in without notice removal stay applications. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:12 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
(See McCollum v. [read post]
